VIAAS Inc. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al
Plaintiff: VIAAS Inc.
Defendant: Amazon.Com Inc. and Ring LLC
Case Number: 6:2022cv01041
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Cardone
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Reset Deadlines: Amazon.Com Inc. and Ring LLC answer due 12/15/2022. (zv)
October 31, 2022 Filing 10 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amazon.Com Inc., Ring LLC identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc. for Ring LLC. (Nash, Brian)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 . Defendants deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs Complaint, ECF No. 1, is EXTENDED until December 15, 2022. Entered by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (KC)
October 28, 2022 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Amazon.Com Inc., Ring LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nash, Brian)
October 11, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by VIAAS Inc.. Amazon.Com Inc. served on 10/10/2022, answer due 10/31/2022. (Ramey, William)
October 7, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Related Cases by VIAAS Inc. (Ramey, William)
October 7, 2022 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties by VIAAS Inc.. (Ramey, William)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amazon.Com Inc. (zv)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Amazon.Com Inc.. (lad)
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Amazon.Com Inc.. (Ramey, William)
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16608440), filed by Amazon.Com Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William)
October 6, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone pursuant to the Order Assigning Business of the Court as it Relates to Patent Cases, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VIAAS Inc. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VIAAS Inc.
Represented By: William P. Ramey, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.Com Inc.
Represented By: Brian Christopher Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ring LLC
Represented By: Brian Christopher Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?