Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. v. Pace Energy Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.
Defendant: Pace Energy Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2015cv00043
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: Midland Office
Presiding Judge: David A. Ezra
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER DENYING 13 Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue ; DENYING 13 Motion to Transfer Venue Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (sm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton Williams Energy, Inc. v. Pace Energy Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.
Represented By: Richard Edward Booth
Represented By: Kenneth Matticks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pace Energy Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?