Hudgins v. Collecto, Inc.
| Triston Hudgins |
| Collecto, Inc. |
| 7:2019cv00234 |
| October 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Counts |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 12/3/2020 10:30 AM in Midland before Judge David Counts, Jury Selection set for 1/4/2021 08:00 AM in Midland before Judge David Counts, Jury Trial set for 1/4/2021 08:00 AM in Midland before Judge David Counts. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Filing 8 Scheduling Recommendations by Collecto, Inc.. (Messenger, Kandy) |
|
It is ORDERED Kyle Stephen Deese's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, Doc. #7 filed October 31, 2019, is GRANTED. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice Pro Hac Vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our Court within 10 days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that if Mr. Deese has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kyle Stephen Deese (Filing fee $ 100.00 receipt number 700015585) by Triston Hudgins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(se) |
|
Filing 6
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge David Counts. (se)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Collecto, Inc.. (Messenger, Kandy) |
| Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Attorney Kyle Deese as to Triston Hudgins. (se) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to JS 44 by Collecto, Inc.. (Messenger, Kandy) |
| Case assigned to Judge David Counts. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (se) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Collecto, Inc.. (Messenger, Kandy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Collecto, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12712948), filed by Collecto, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Messenger, Kandy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hudgins v. Collecto, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Collecto, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kandy E. Messenger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Triston Hudgins | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Deese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
