Johnson v. TX Parole Bd
Petitioner: Ronald Wayne Johnson
Respondent: TX Parole Bd
Case Number: 7:2022cv00208
Filed: September 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Counts
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING SANCTIONS FROM AN EARLIER CASE, ADMINISTRATIVELYCLOSING THIS CASE, Certificate of Appealability is Denied, ***Set/Clear Flags. Signed by Judge David Counts. (kg)
September 27, 2022 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter. (je3)
September 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $ 5-DUE.), filed by Ronald Wayne Johnson.(je3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. TX Parole Bd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronald Wayne Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TX Parole Bd
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?