Estes v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Joanna Estes
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2010cv00015
Filed: February 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Weber
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order-The Court hereby Approves and Adopts the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Warner in its entirety and denying 22 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/7/12. (jmr) Modified on 2/8/2012 to fix typo(jmr).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estes v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanna Estes
Represented By: Wendy W. Fenton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?