Pumphrey v. Wood et al
Plaintiff: William C. Pumphrey
Defendant: John Wood, Todd Richardson and Brandon Holt
Case Number: 1:2012cv00115
Filed: May 30, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 80 Motion to file subpoenas for the production of documents; denying 85 Motion for additional subpoenas; denying 90 Motion for Leave to File plaintiffs opposition to defendant's motion for su mmary judgment; denying 95 Motion to clarify authority to subpoena records beyond the scope allowable for a Martinez Report; GRANTING 99 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, and Plaintiff's claims are DI SMISSED with prejudice; denying 100 Motion for Hearing; denying 103 Motion for Extension of Time to answer defendants Martinez Report. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE this Case. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 3/25/2015. (kpf)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT AMENDED COMPLAINT & MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 5 Motion to be provided with copies; Denied as moot 8 Motion to Amend/Correct his complaint. Plaintiff has since filed an amended complaint.; granting 9 Motion to be provided with copies of his original and amended complaint; denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 14 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). There is no valid complaint on filed to be served. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this order to cure the deficiencies noted. The Clerks Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 7/25/2012. (kpf)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT COMPLAINT & MEMORANDUM DECISION. Plaintiff shall have thirty days of this order to cure the deficiencies. The Clerks Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according tot he instructions here this action will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 6/13/2012. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pumphrey v. Wood et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William C. Pumphrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?