Orbit Irrigation Products v. Melnor
Plaintiff: Orbit Irrigation Products
Defendant: Melnor
Case Number: 1:2016cv00137
Filed: September 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Northern Office
County: Davis
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS-denying 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; denying 23 Motion to Transfer Venue without prejudice. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/3/17. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orbit Irrigation Products v. Melnor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orbit Irrigation Products
Represented By: David P. Johnson
Represented By: Brent P. Lorimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melnor
Represented By: Darrin A. Auito
Represented By: Scott M. Daniels
Represented By: J. Kevin Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?