Packer et al v. Pioneer Pipe Line
| Susan R. Packer, Old Orchard Investments Limited Partners, David A. Packer and Karen A. Kostiuk-Bikhazi |
| Pioneer Pipe Line |
| 1:2020cv00177 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case Reassigned to District Judge per request of one or more party(s) on Report of Attorney Planning Meeting #8 . Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
| Filing 8 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order stipulated proposed order)(Yancey, Jason) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Susan R. Packer, David A. Packer, Karen A. Kostiuk-Bikhazi, Old Orchard Investments Limited Partners as to Pioneer Pipe Line served on 12/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and complaint)(Yancey, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #5 Return of Service. The document is improperly filed. Please resubmit as Summons Returned Executed with court issued summons attached. The clerk requests the filer of the original document to refile the pleading. The new pleading will receive a new document number on the docket. (alf) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** RETURN OF SERVICE Executed for Acceptance served on Scott Wiseman on December 17, 2020, filed by Plaintiffs Karen A. Kostiuk-Bikhazi, Old Orchard Investments Limited Partners, David A. Packer, Susan R. Packer. (Yancey, Jason) Modified on 12/18/2020 - stricken as improperly filed (alf). |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 12/11/20. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Pioneer Pipe Line. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (dw) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Pioneer Pipe Line (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3831040) filed by Susan R. Packer, David A. Packer, Karen A. Kostiuk-Bikhazi, Old Orchard Investments Limited Partners. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (Yancey, Jason) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Plaintiffs Karen A. Kostiuk-Bikhazi, Old Orchard Investments Limited Partners, David A. Packer, Susan R. Packer are directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (dw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
