Aquapower et al v. Yurth et al
Aquapower and Aquaenergy |
David G. Yurth, Crit Randall Killen, Edward G. Price, Environmental Potentials, Leonhardt Schroedter, Roger L. Carefoot, Nova Institute of Technology, Jeffrey J. Frandsen, Scott R. Schreyer and Michael S. Kralik |
2:2010cv00568 |
June 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 87 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 89 Motion for Attorney Fees. The hearing set for Wednesday, June 8, 2011 is Stricken. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 6/2/2011. (las) |
Filing 91 ORDER DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS. CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will still address the pending motions for attorneys fees when they are fully briefed. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 3/29/2011. (ce) |
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants Killen, Schroedter, and Carefoot's 61 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying Defendants Yurth, Nova Institution of Technology, Frandsen, Schreyer, and Kralik's 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 2/28/2011. (las) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.