Smith v. Argyle et al
Gregory Smith |
Mark A. Costes, Kenilworth Point, Scott Argyle, Scott Schryer, Dale Murray, Per Skoldin, Richard Pyper, Steven Vereen, Commonwealth Financial Group and Dynamic Management Services |
2:2010cv01268 |
December 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Wasatch |
Clark Waddoups |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 211 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 184 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 06/24/2013. (asp) |
Filing 201 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 198 Motion to Compel. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/10/13. (jmr) |
Filing 189 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 185 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 185 Motion to Expedite; taking under advisement/expedited briefing 188 Motion to Quash. Plaintiff must file his response, if any, by close of business on May 28, 2013. Defendants must file their reply, if any, by close of business on June 4, 2013. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 5/21/13. (jmr) |
Filing 94 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 67 Motion to Amend Complaint and Scheduling Order; terminating as moot 92 Motion to Amend/Correct; 3-Day Jury Trial reset for 4/29/2013 08:30 AM in Room 102 before Judge Clark Waddoups. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/29/12 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.