Insurance Company of the West v. Wallace Investment Limited Partnership et al
||Insurance Company of the West
||Deanne H. Wallace, Wallace Investment Limited Partnership and William Dean Wallace
||June 2, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Utah
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 30, 2013
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order-having considered the Detailed Account, the parties arguments contained in the briefs including the Lone Peak Defendants objections, and adopting the reasoning of United Pacific,the court awards $270,913.58 which represents the fees/costs/losses as detailed by ICW less the amount paid by the Wallace Defendants. Signed by Judge David Sam on 12/30/13. (jmr)
|October 17, 2013
MEMORANDUM DECISION-The court hereby AFFIRMS the previous decision entered on August 29, 2013 with the clarification, as noted above, that the Ezell Defendants are not bound by the prior decision. This decision supplements the August 29, 2013 Memorandum Decision with the aboveanalysis. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge David Sam on 10/17/13. (jmr)
|August 29, 2013
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 47 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is ordered to provide a detailed account of the losses and expenses it has incurred in enforcing the Set Aside Agreement and the Indemnity Agreement to assist the court in calculating the exact amount of damages. The parties are hereby ordered to contact the court within ten (10) days from the date of thisorder to establish the schedule for plaintiffs disclosures. Signed by Judge David Sam on 8/29/13. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?