Burbidge Mitchell & Gross v. Olson et al
| Burbidge Mitchell & Gross |
| Timothy Olson, Kenneth W. Griswold, Paul H. Peters, C and M Properties, High Mountain Partners and JJRRNL Trust 1998 |
| 2:2011cv00640 |
| July 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dee Benson |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
238
MEMORANDUM DECISION: The court concludes that no jury could reasonably find that the state-court malpractice action, filed by the Olson defendants, was not supported by probable cause as that standard is interpreted by the Utah Suprem e Court in Gilbert v. Ince, 981 P.2d 841 (Utah 1999).6Because plaintiff has failed to establish the underlying claim for wrongful use of civil proceedings, plaintiffs related claims of civil conspiracy and aiding and abetting wrongful use of civil proceedings likewise fail. Therefore, the court GRANTS defendants motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice.. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/23/14. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
210
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 158 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 8/28/13. (jlw)
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERgranting 179 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 184 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/22/13. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
