Wyttenbach v. Parrish
Plaintiff: William Hayes Wyttenbach
Defendant: Ranita Marie Parrish
Case Number: 2:2011cv00968
Filed: October 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM DECISION-granting 2 Motion to Dismiss Denied-finding as moot 32 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; Denied-finding as moot 36 Motion ; Denied-finding as moot 12 Motion to Strike ; Denied-finding as moot 21 Motion to Stay; Denied-finding as moot 24 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/23/12. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wyttenbach v. Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Hayes Wyttenbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ranita Marie Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?