Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Summit Escrow and Title Agency
Plaintiff: Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Defendant: Summit Escrow and Title Agency
Case Number: 2:2011cv01061
Filed: November 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Summit
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDERdenying 7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 06/21/2012. (tls)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Summit Escrow and Title Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit Escrow and Title Agency
Represented By: James Delos Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Represented By: Laura S. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?