One Source Industries et al v. Parkinson et al
| OCC Media and One Source Industries |
| Edward Parkinson, Jill Parkinson and Donald Hermann |
| 2:2013cv00041 |
| January 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Ted Stewart |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 59 Jill Parkinsons Motion to Dismiss ; denying 60 Donald Hermanns Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 2/11/14. (ss)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 43 Defendant Jill Parkinsons Motion to Dismiss and;the 45 Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Order Reflecting Defendants Stipulationand the February 19, 2013 Hearing. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/16/13. (ss)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 15 Motion for Service of Process. The United States Marshals Service shall serve a summons, a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, and a copy of this Order upon Defendant Donald Hermann. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 1/30/13. (ss)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying in part 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Plaintiffs counsel shall serve Defendants with a copy of the Complaint and this Motion within seven (7) days and file proof of such service with the Court. The Court will set this Motion for a hearing at that time. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 01/17/2013. (asp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
