Mitochon Practice Management Systems v. Healthcare Technology Alliance et al
| Mitochon Practice Management Systems |
| Healthcare Technology Alliance, Richard J. Nielsen, RJ Nielsen Family Partnership, Akamai Practice Management, Medtrak Data Systems, Valli Information Systems, Robert Putnam, Mark Service and Robert Jenkins |
| 2:2013cv00177 |
| March 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Brooke C. Wells |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERgranting 68 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. Because this decisiondisposes of all the remaining claims in the case, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/23/2015. (jds)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 63 Motion to Withdraw and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Withdraw Deemed Admissions. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7/21/2014. (jds)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 50 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/4/13 (alt)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9/4/13 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
