Global Fitness Holdings, LLC v. Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Global Fitness Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc.
Case Number:
2:2013cv00204
Filed:
March 21, 2013
Court:
Utah District Court
Office:
Central Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
David Nuffer
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Other
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | 458 |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 402 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative MOTION for New Trial. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 5/5/17 (alt)
|
| October 9, 2015 | 362 |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 354 Motion in Limine; granting 357 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 10/9/15 (alt)
|
| September 14, 2015 | 323 |
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order Regarding Accounting: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet, confer and on or before September 21, 2015, submit a joint memorandum of less than eleven pages describing the proof available of the collection or processing of these fees after termination of the Contracts. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/14/15. (jlw)
|
| August 31, 2015 | 279 |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND WRITTEN ORDER FOLLOWING 251 Sealed Minute Order on 121 Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Global's Tortious Interference Claim for Lack of Causation (oral order of 5/11/15). Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/31/15 (alt)
|
| March 30, 2015 | 244 |
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 132 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim Against FRAI as it Relates to the Transfer of Data. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/28/15 (alt)
|
| March 20, 2013 | 34 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Dft's 18 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; 2) Dft's 18 alternative motion to transfer venue to the USDC for the District of Utah is GRANTED; 3) Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the USDC for the Distr ict of Utah; and 4) Dft's 19 "Motion to Hold Initial Meeting and Report Deadlines in Abeyance" and Pla's 27 "Motion for a Hearing on Paramount's Motion to Hold Initial Meeting and Report Deadlines in Abeyance" are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 3/20/2013. (KLB) cc: COR [Transferred from Kentucky Eastern on 3/21/2013.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Global Fitness Holdings, LLC v. Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Global Fitness Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David L. Mortensen |
| Represented By: | David A. Owen |
| Represented By: | Matthew A. Stinnett |
| Represented By: | Emma R. Vaughan-Cherubin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Recovery Acceptance, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Rod N. Andreason |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
