Berti v. UBS Bank USA
Petitioner: Reynold Berti, II
Respondent: UBS Bank USA
Case Number: 2:2014cv00357
Filed: May 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: David Sam
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order- dismissing 3 Motion to Compel; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by Judge David Sam on 8/7/14. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berti v. UBS Bank USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reynold Berti, II
Represented By: Josh R. Dell
Represented By: Christine T. Greenwood
Represented By: James E. Magleby
Represented By: Robert A. Stok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UBS Bank USA
Represented By: Joshua S. Bratspies
Represented By: Stephen P. Horvat
Represented By: Julian W. Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?