Spurlino v. Holcim et al
||Holcim and Ash Grove Cement
||June 23, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Utah
||Paul M. Warner
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 1, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 79 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 117 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Westroc, Inc.s claim under the UUPA was transferred first to Westroc, LLCby operation of the conversion and then to K ilgoreby operation of the MPA. Because Holdco never succeeded to any claims of Westroc, Inc., it could not have assigned them to Spurlino. Accordingly, the court concludes that Spurlino lacks standing to bring his UUPA claim. Count I of Spurlinos Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/1/17. (jlw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?