Wilkerson v. Hoggard et al
| Ryan Wilkerson |
| Dennis Hoggard, Preston Palmer and James Chipp |
| 2:2014cv00586 |
| August 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Washington |
| Dale A. Kimball |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting Motion for Summary Judgment. It is ORDERED that: claims against Defendants Eldridge, Young, and Chipp are DISMISSED; Defendant Chipps Motion for Summary Judgment 94 is DENIED as moot; SJC Defendants Hoggard and Palmers Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs failure-to-protect claim under the Federal Constitution 82 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/27/17. (dla)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 56 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; and denying 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/28/2016. (eat)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Ordergranting 5 and 13 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). The United States Marshals Service shall serve a summons, a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, and a copy of this Order upon Defendants James Chipp, Preston Palmer, Dennis Hoggard; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 11 Motion waiver of court procedures. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/11/2015. (jds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
