Critchfield v. Blazin Wings
Roland Critchfield |
Blazin Wings |
2:2015cv00794 |
November 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Evelyn J. Furse |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Blazin Wings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 5/12/2017. (las) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Critchfield v. Blazin Wings | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roland Critchfield | |
Represented By: | Daniel F. Bertch |
Represented By: | Kevin K. Robson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blazin Wings | |
Represented By: | Sean C. Miller |
Represented By: | Samantha E. Wilcox |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.