Casey v. State of Utah Third Judicial District Court et al
Michael Shawn Casey |
State of Utah Third Judicial District Court, Dean H. Becker and Michael R. Socora |
2:2015cv00891 |
December 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Jill N. Parrish |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and follow the Courts Order. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 12/30/16. (jlw) |
Filing 20 ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel; however, if, after the case develops further, it appears that counsel may be needed or of specific help, the Court will ask an attorney to appear pro bono on Plainti ff's behalf. denying 15 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner); denying 19 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff must within thirty days cure the Amended Complaints deficiencies noted in this order. The Clerk's Office shall mail P laintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a form complaint and habeas petition for Plaintiff to use should he choose to file an amended complaint or a habeas-corpus petition. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this Order's instructions, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/23/16. (jlw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.