HealthBanc International v. Synergy Worldwide et al
| HealthBanc International |
| Synergy Worldwide, Nature's Sunshine Products, Dan Norman, Richard Strulson and Steven Bunker |
| 2:2016cv00135 |
| February 19, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Utah |
| Jill N. Parrish |
| Paul M. Warner |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 125 Synergys and Natures Sunshines motion for summary judgment ; granting in part and denying in part 129 HealthBancs motion for summary judgment on Synergys brea ch of contract counterclaim; granting 150 HealthBancs and Feldmans motion for summary judgment on Synergys fraud in the inducement counterclaim ; granting 121 HealthBancs motion to exclude expert testimony ; denying as moot 122 Synergys motion to exclude expert testimony. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/1/2019. (jds)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 31 Counterclaim Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. Synergy has not adequately pled its fraudulent inducement cause of action. The dismissal is without prejudice. Synergy has leave from the court to amend the fraud in the inducement cause of action contained within its counterclaim on or before October 7, 2016. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/22/16. (jlw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
