Access 4 All v. Commons at Sugarhouse, The
||Access 4 All
||Commons at Sugarhouse, The
||October 19, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Utah
||Paul M. Warner
|Nature of Suit:
||Americans with Disabilities - Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 12188
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 5, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER sustaining objection to 14 Order; granting 10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Lawrence A. Fuller for Access 4 All; granting 11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Allen D. Fuller for A ccess 4 All; denying 30 Motion to Stay. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/5/17 (alt)
|November 15, 2016
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - denying 10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice ; denying 11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Accordingly, Lawrence Fuller, Allen Fuller, and Ms. Burningham are hereby ORDERED to show cause why each of them should not be sanctioned under Rule 11, sanctioned under the courts inherent authority, and/or referred to the courts disciplinary committee. Written responses must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order and must include any arguments that counsel intend to advance. Based on the written responses,the court may either issue a ruling or set a hearing. Failure to respond to this order will result in contempt sanctions and in referral to the disciplinary committee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/15/2016. (las)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?