E. et al v. United Healthcare Services et al
| Peter E. and Eric E. |
| United Healthcare Services, United Behavioral Health and Keysight Medical Plan |
| 2:2017cv00435 |
| May 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| David Nuffer |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order granting in part and denying in part 105 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 107 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/15/2021. (jl)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 74 Motion to Conduct Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 08/03/2020. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 58 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/18/19 (alt)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs have leave to to file a second amended complaint to correct the deficiencies in their Parity Act claim by no later than 8/9/19. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 7/19/19 (alt)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint; denying without prejudice 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/20/18 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
