Domo v. Grow et al
||Grow and Rob Nelson
||July 14, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Utah
||Evelyn J. Furse
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 10, 2018
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; The trade dress infringement claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The patent infringement claim is DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE because claim 1 of the asserted 740 patent is invalid. The court has dismissed both of Domos federal claims. Accordingly, the remaining state-law claims of fraud, tortious interference, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. The clerk of the court is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 5/10/2018. (jds)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?