Chaides v. Utah State Prison et al
| Daniel R. Chaides |
| Utah State Prison and B. Strong |
| 2:2017cv01033 |
| September 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Jill N. Parrish |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER denying 40 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. This action remains closed. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 1/2/2020. (jds)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND DISMISSAL ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs second motion for appointed counsel is DENIED, 37 , for the same reasons stated in the Courts order, 5 , denying Plaintiffs first motion for appointed counsel, 4 . Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/16/2019. (jds)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER Dismissing Defendants & Ordering Service of Process on Remaining Defendants. The United States Marshals Service shall serve a summons, a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, and a copy of this Order upon, B. Stron g (USP); Officer Zimmerman (USP); Officer C. Graham (USP); Nurse Adam Archer (USP); and University of Utah Telamed mental health doctor, an Asian female. State of Utah and Utah State Prison terminated. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/25/2018. (jwt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
