Sposi et al v. Santa Clara City
| Mary Beth Sposi and Menlo Smith |
| Santa Clara City |
| 2:2017cv01057 |
| September 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Washington |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS the Petitioner's motion (ECF No. 67 ) and DENIES Verizon and Santa Clara City's motions (ECF Nos. 68 , 69 ). Accordingly, the City's decision is REVERSED and the court REMANDS this case to the City to issue a decision consistent with this ruling. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 11/5/2021. (reb)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-granting 46 Motion to Compel; denying 22 Motion for TRO; denying 31 Motion to Dismiss Party. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/3/18. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement; Motions terminated: 6 MOTION for More Definite Statement and Memorandum in Support filed by Santa Clara City. The court ORDERS Plaintiffs to address on or before April 10, 2018 whether Verizon must be joined as an indispensable party. Responsive and reply briefs, if any, shall follow DUCivR 7-1(b)(3) about filing times. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/27/18. (jmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
