Contagious v. Groupon

Plaintiff: Contagious
Defendant: Groupon
Case Number: 2:2018cv00235
Filed: March 19, 2018
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Central Office
County: Wasatch
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Referring Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17:0101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order 56 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 37 Motion to Amend/Correct Standard Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 11/20/18 (alt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contagious v. Groupon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Contagious
Represented By: Randall B. Bateman
Represented By: Lauren N. Chauncey
Represented By: Sarah W. Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Groupon
Represented By: Eva K. Freel
Represented By: Robyn L. Phillips
Represented By: William J. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?