IHC Health Services v. CR England et al
| IHC Health Services |
| CR England and Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah |
| 2:2018cv00507 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Brooke C Wells |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Deadline for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah to respond to the #2 Complaint is extended to 9/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 8/23/18. (dla)
|
| Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Extending Deadline to Respond to Complaint) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. Attorney Timothy C. Houpt added to party Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah(pty:dft)(Houpt, Timothy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to #2 Complaint. Defendant C.R. England, Inc. may have an extension of time to and including 9/21/2018, within which to file its Answer to the Complaint in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 8/22/18. (dla)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant CR England. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. Attorney Scott A. Hagen added to party CR England(pty:dft)(Hagen, Scott) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/29/18. (ss)
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by IHC Health Services as to Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah Waiver sent on 6/27/2018, answer due 8/27/2018. (Amadon, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #4 filed by Plaintiff IHC Health Services (Amadon, Joseph) |
|
Filing 5
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/29/18. (ss) Modified on 6/29/2018 (ss). Order was entered twice.
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/29/18. (ss)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL - Judge Dale A. Kimball recused. Case reassigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 6/27/2018. (eat)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3038235) filed by IHC Health Services. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (Schaap, Marcie) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball. Plaintiff IHC Health Services is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
