Property Management Business Solutions v. Schifferdecker et al
| Property Management Business Solutions |
| LS Management, Rodd Schifferdecker and Gregory M. Lea |
| 2:2018cv00592 |
| July 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Bruce S Jenkins |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT (Verified) against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3061758) filed by Property Management Business Solutions. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - October 19, 2012 Franchise Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2 - October 19, 2012 Renewal Guaranty, #4 Exhibit 3 - Non-Renewal Letter) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Francis, Lewis) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Plaintiff Property Management Business Solutions is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
