Suda v. Bajarangbali
| Linda Suda |
| Bajarangbali |
| 2:2018cv00762 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12188 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated per #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (las) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Linda Suda (Crane, Matthew) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is directed to respond in writing no later than November 26, 2018 and inform the Court as to the status of the case and Plaintiff's intentions to proceed. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 11/8/2018. (nas)
|
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Linda Suda as to Bajarangbali served on 10/1/2018, answer due 10/22/2018. (Crane, Matthew) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 9/27/2018. (las)
|
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Bajarangbali. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Bajarangbali (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3111818) filed by Linda Suda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse (Crane, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Plaintiff Linda Suda is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suda v. Bajarangbali | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Suda | |
| Represented By: | Matthew B. Crane |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bajarangbali | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
