Cisneros v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
| Rodolfo Morales Cisneros |
| Estelle Unit, Prisoner Litigation Unit and Texas Department of Criminal Justice |
| 2:2018cv00931 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RECEIPT: paper documents received by USDC S Dist TX on 1/7/19 (alt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2019: #1 Searchable copy of document) (jwt). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to USDC Southern District of Texas via Electronic Transfer given case number 4:18-cv-04743. (rks) |
Filing 2
ORDER Dismissing the case in this court and transferring action to USDC Southern District of TX. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 12/13/18 (alt)
|
| Interdistrict Transfer to So TX. Record transferred to receiving court electronically (however pro se paper docs are being mailed separately). All future documents should be filed in USDC So District of TX Court - CASE CLOSED (alt) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Rodolfo Morales Cisneros. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 12/04/2018) (tlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
