Hood v. Skanchy
| Howard Hood |
| Randall Skanchy |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2019cv00622 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dee Benson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
**SEALED DOCUMENT**Accounting Transactions and Balances Report filed by Plaintiff Howard Hood. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Cover Letter)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 3
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4681088167) Fee Status: PAID. (Originally received on 10/07/2019) filed by Howard Hood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope, #3 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Dee Benson (tlh)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Petitioner shall have thirty days from the date of this Order to file with the Court a certified copy of Petitioner's inmate trust fund account statements for the six months immediately preceding the submission of the petition and the warden's certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 10/07/2019. (tlh)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 09/04/2019) filed by Plaintiff Howard Hood. (tlh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
