Hafen v. Muir
| Jonathan O. Hafen |
| Jeanne Muir |
| 2:2019cv00913 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Tena Campbell |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/20/20 (alt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/30/20 (alt)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Tracy on behalf of Jeanne Muir (Tracy, James)
|
|
Filing 5
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Jeanne Muir. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Attorney Joshua L. Lee added to party Jeanne Muir(pty:dft)(Lee, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 4
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan O. Hafen as to Jeanne Muir served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. (Mooers-Putzer, David)
|
|
Filing 3
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Jeanne Muir. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Jeanne Muir (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3420898) filed by Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Mooers-Putzer, David)
|
|
Filing 1
Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (tlh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hafen v. Muir | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan O. Hafen | |
| Represented By: | David P. Mooers-Putzer |
| Represented By: | Cynthia D. Love |
| Represented By: | Joseph Covey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jeanne Muir | |
| Represented By: | Joshua L. Lee |
| Represented By: | James K. Tracy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
