Hafen v. Muir
Plaintiff: Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant: Jeanne Muir
Case Number: 2:2019cv00913
Filed: November 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 754
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/20/20 (alt)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/30/20 (alt)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Tracy on behalf of Jeanne Muir (Tracy, James)
January 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Complaint filed by Defendant Jeanne Muir. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Attorney Joshua L. Lee added to party Jeanne Muir(pty:dft)(Lee, Joshua)
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan O. Hafen as to Jeanne Muir served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. (Mooers-Putzer, David)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Jeanne Muir. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Jeanne Muir (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3420898) filed by Jonathan O. Hafen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Mooers-Putzer, David)
November 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff Jonathan O. Hafen is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (tlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hafen v. Muir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan O. Hafen
Represented By: David P. Mooers-Putzer
Represented By: Cynthia D. Love
Represented By: Joseph Covey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeanne Muir
Represented By: Joshua L. Lee
Represented By: James K. Tracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?