Beauty Industry Group Opco v. Landmark Technology A
Plaintiff: Beauty Industry Group Opco
Defendant: Landmark Technology A
Case Number: 2:2020cv00590
Filed: August 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15:1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2020 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Landmark Technology A with Jury Demand. filed by Beauty Industry Group Opco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Landmark Technology Patent, #2 Exhibit B-Demand Letter, #3 Exhibit C-Landmark PTAB Decision, #4 Exhibit D-Follow Up Letter, #5 Exhibit E-USPTO Guidelines, #6 Exhibit F-District Attorney Letter) (White, Gabriel)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/20/20. (alf)
August 19, 2020 Filing 4 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jl)
August 19, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Nathan A. Evans, for Plaintiff Beauty Industry Group Opco (jl)
August 19, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Landmark Technology A (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3689333) filed by Beauty Industry Group Opco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Beauty Industry Group v. Landmark Technology, #2 Exhibit A-Landmark Technology Patent, #3 Exhibit B-Demand Letter, #4 Exhibit C-Landmark PTAB Decision, #5 Exhibit D-Follow Up Letter, #6 Exhibit E-USPTO Guidelines, #7 Exhibit F-District Attorney Letter) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (White, Gabriel)
August 19, 2020 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Plaintiff Beauty Industry Group Opco is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beauty Industry Group Opco v. Landmark Technology A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark Technology A
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beauty Industry Group Opco
Represented By: Gabriel K. White
Represented By: Daniel S. Garner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?