E. v. Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators
Plaintiff: L. E.
Defendant: Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators
Case Number: 2:2020cv00707
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators, Plaintiff L. E.. Form due by 10/28/2020. (alf)
October 13, 2020 Filing 6 File Received from Third District Court, Salt Lake County consisting of Docket Sheet, Complaint, Acceptance of Service, Notice of Removal and applicable State Court returns. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint Return of Electronic Notification, #3 Acceptance of Service, #4 Acceptance of Service Return of Electronic Notification, #5 Notice of Removal, #6 Notice of Removal Return of Electronic Notification) (alf)
October 13, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed to Defendant Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators and Plaintiff L. E. (dw)
October 13, 2020 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Hill, Christopher)
October 13, 2020 Filing 3 ERRATA/EXHIBIT to #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Defendant Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators See attached Civil Cover Sheet. (Hill, Christopher) Modified on 10/13/2020 - document filed incorrectly, should have been an exhibit to notice of removal #2 (alf).
October 13, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 200905694, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3754712) filed by Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (Hill, Christopher)
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Defendant Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (dw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E. v. Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L. E.
Represented By: Joseph David Amadon
Represented By: Marcie E. Schaap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deseret Mutual Benefit Administrators
Represented By: Christopher S. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?