Easley v. Walmart
| Eugene Easley |
| Walmart |
| 2:2021cv00161 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Howard C Nielson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: This action is hereby STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order to allow the parties to pursue settlement through mediation. If the parties are able to reach a settlement through mediation within 90 days, they shall so inform the court. If the parties are unable to reach a settlement through mediation within 90 days, they shall, on or before October 19, 2021, either file a status report with the court or file a stipulated motion for entry of a scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 7/21/21. (dla)
|
| Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION to Stay Action filed by Defendant Walmart. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Rice, Mitchel) |
| Filing 7 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rice, Mitchel) |
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. So ordered by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 3/18/21 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
|
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Walmart. (Rice, Mitchel) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) filed by Walmart. (Rice, Mitchel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Eugene Easley, Defendant Walmart. (nmt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 210900168, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3953850) filed by Walmart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Rice, Mitchel) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant Walmart is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Easley v. Walmart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Easley | |
| Represented By: | Bruce M. Franson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Keysar |
| Represented By: | Marianne Schumann |
| Represented By: | Mitchel T. Rice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
