Domo Inc v. Onelive
Plaintiff: Domo Inc
Defendant: Onelive a Texas limited liability company doing business as One Live Media
Case Number: 2:2021cv00196
Filed: March 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Domo Inc, Defendant Onelive. (nmt)
March 30, 2021 Filing 4 Defendant's MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Wade L. McClure , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3965511,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Onelive. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rudd, Jonathan)
March 30, 2021 Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jason C. McKenney , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-3965474,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Onelive. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rudd, Jonathan)
March 30, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 210900789, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3965383) filed by Onelive. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (Rudd, Jonathan)
March 30, 2021 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Defendant Onelive is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Domo Inc v. Onelive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Domo Inc
Represented By: Cole S. Cannon
Represented By: Richard L. Jenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Onelive a Texas limited liability company doing business as One Live Media
Represented By: Jonathan R. Rudd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?