Pacheco v. Walmart Stores
Plaintiff: Rhonda Pacheco
Defendant: Walmart Stores
Case Number: 2:2021cv00258
Filed: April 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Dustin B Pead
Referring Judge: Robert J Shelby
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Stay Action for Mediation Conference. Plaintiff is to file a status report within 7 days of the Mediation Conference. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 6/16/21 (alt)
June 16, 2021 Filing 10 Motions No Longer Referred: #9 Stipulated MOTION to Stay Action (mjm)
June 15, 2021 Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION to Stay Action filed by Defendant Walmart Stores. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Rice, Mitchel)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 5/28/2021. (mjm)
May 27, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE to Discovery Request from Walmart filed by Plaintiff Rhonda Pacheco.(Vilos, James)
May 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/10/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 12/10/2021. Expert Discovery due by 7/29/2022. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 8/25/2022. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 5/13/21. (dla)
May 10, 2021 Filing 5 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rice, Mitchel)
April 28, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) filed by Walmart Stores. (Rice, Mitchel)
April 27, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Rhonda Pacheco, Defendant Walmart Stores. (mh)
April 27, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 210901856, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3990670) filed by Walmart Stores. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (Rice, Mitchel)
April 27, 2021 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby. Defendant Walmart Stores is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacheco v. Walmart Stores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Stores
Represented By: Andrea M. Keysar
Represented By: Marianne Schumann
Represented By: Mitchel T. Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rhonda Pacheco
Represented By: James D. Vilos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?