Jensen v. Pebblekick
| Trygve Jensen |
| Pebblekick |
| 2:2021cv00353 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 2/28/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 2/28/2022. Expert Discovery due by 9/30/2022. Dispositive or Potentially Dispositive Motions due by 10/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 7/14/21. (dla)
|
| Filing 7 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Dance, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) with Jury Demand filed by Pebblekick. (Lang, Trevor) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/14/21. (dla)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 6/9/21. (dla)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Trygve Jensen, Defendant Pebblekick. (nmt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Court, Utah County, case number 210400545, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4024856) filed by Pebblekick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit C - Return of Summons and Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Lang, Trevor) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant Pebblekick is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jensen v. Pebblekick | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pebblekick | |
| Represented By: | Trevor C. Lang |
| Represented By: | Erik A. Olson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trygve Jensen | |
| Represented By: | Nicolas Castanuela Wilde |
| Represented By: | D. Loren Washburn |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Dance |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
