Consultus v. AT&T Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Consultus
Defendant: AT&T Corporation a New York corporation doing business as AT7T Mobile and Business Soltuions, AT&T Mobility Corporation and AT&T Corporation a New York corporation doing business as AT&T Mobile and Business Soltuions
Counter Claimant: AT&T Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv00629
Filed: October 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Referring Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per 29 Docket Text Order. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned to case. Case Closed. (mh) Modified to include docket text order information on 10/31/2022 (mh).
October 28, 2022 Filing 30 Modification of Docket re #27 MOTION: Error: Plaintiff filed #27 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice without signature from opposing counsel. Plaintiff refiled #28 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice with signatures. Correction: Terminated #27 Motion and struck docket text.(mh)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 DOCKET TEXT ORDER. On October 28, 2022, the parties filed their #28 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Corrected). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulated dismissal with prejudice is self-effectuating. The case has been dismissed with prejudice per the terms of the stipulated dismissal, with no fees, costs, or expenses awarded as to any party. No further order will follow. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 10/28/2022. (cfm)
October 28, 2022 Filing 28 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice (Corrected) filed by Plaintiff Consultus, Counter Defendant Consultus. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Christiansen, Stephen)
October 28, 2022 Filing 27 *STRICKEN* Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Consultus, Counter Defendant Consultus. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Christiansen, Stephen) Modified on 10/28/2022 per #28 corrected version filed (mh).
June 27, 2022 Filing 26 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg: Motion Hearing held on 6/27/2022 re #21 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents in responses to discovery requests filed by AT&T Corporation. The parties are present via zoom. The court hears argument from counsel. The court grants the motion. Attorney for Plaintiff: Tony Stirling, Attorney for Defendant: Jared Scott. Court Reporter: Electronic-via Zoom.(Time Start: 3:28, Time End: 4:45, Room Chambers.)(lam)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #21 Motion for Short Term Discovery. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, Defendant's motion seeking to compel Plaintiff to produce documents responsive to Requests for Production Nos. 2 and 4 is granted. Plaintiff acknowledged the production was deficient. Plaintiff shall produce all responsive documents within fourteen days. Defendant's request for an award of costs is denied as Plaintiff's position was substantially justified, where Defendant filed this motion shortly after conferring about the deficiency and before giving Plaintiff a chance to cure it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/27/2022. No attached document. (med)
June 22, 2022 Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion re #21 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents in responses to discovery requests filed by Plaintiff Consultus, Counter Defendant Consultus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Stirling, Anthony)
June 17, 2022 Filing 23 DEPOSITION of AT&T Corp. taken on 08/01/2022 filed by Plaintiff Consultus.(Stirling, Anthony)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Setting ZOOM Hearing on Motion #21 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents in responses to discovery requests : Motion Hearing set for 6/27/2022 at 03:30 PM in US District Court-SLCU *virtual Court Via Zoom Conference* before Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Zoom information will be emailed to counsel and available on Judge Oberg's calendar the day before the hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/16/2022. (lam)
June 15, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION for Short Form Discovery re: documents in responses to discovery requests filed by Defendant AT&T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - AT&T's First Set of Discovery Requests, #2 Exhibit B - Consultus's Response to First Set of Discovery Requests, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Scott, Jared)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DOCKET TEXT ORDER finding as moot #18 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of #15 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. The court has granted the requested extensions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/13/2022. No attached document. (med)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order Close of Fact Discovery due by 08/05/2022. Expert Discovery due by 10/28/2022. See order for other deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 06/13/2022. (jl)
June 10, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to File Reply In Support of Request to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Consultus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Reply In Support of Request to Extend Discovery Deadlines) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Stirling, Anthony)
June 10, 2022 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant AT&T Corporation. (Scott, Jared)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Any response or opposition to #15 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery shall be filed by June 10, 2022. No reply is permitted unless ordered by the court. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 6/6/2022. (med)
June 3, 2022 Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Consultus. Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Stirling, Anthony) Modified by correcting event on 6/13/2022 (jl).
March 7, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Jacob D. Barney filed by Jacob D Barney on behalf of AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility Corporation (Barney, Jacob)
February 28, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL of Joshua B. Cutler filed by Stephen K. Christiansen on behalf of Consultus (Christiansen, Stephen)
November 19, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #8 Counterclaim filed by Consultus.(Stirling, Anthony)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/26/2022. Motions due by 11/30/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/7/2022 at 02:45 PM in Rm 8.100 before Judge David Barlow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 11/17/2021. (jl)
November 16, 2021 Filing 10 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Stirling, Anthony)
November 10, 2021 Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Consultus, Counter Defendant Consultus. (Christiansen, Stephen)
October 29, 2021 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) , COUNTERCLAIM against Consultus filed by AT&T Mobility Corporation, AT&T Corporation. (Scott, Jared)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a schedule to Defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report, available on the District of Utah's website at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling, within fourteen (14) days. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/27/2021. (jl)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero recused. Case referral reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 10/26/2021. (jl)
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 10/25/2021. (ep)
October 25, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob D Barney on behalf of AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility Corporation (Barney, Jacob)
October 22, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility Corporation, Plaintiff Consultus. (nmt)
October 22, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 4th District Court Utah County, case number 210401343, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4146565) filed by AT&T Mobility Corporation, AT&T Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to Adverse Party of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Barlow (Scott, Jared)
October 22, 2021 Filing 1 Please note the change in case number to 2:21-cv-00629-DBBCase has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Defendants AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility Corporation is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt) Modified on 10/22/2021 to correct the case number to 2:21-cv-00629-DBB (nl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Consultus v. AT&T Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Consultus
Represented By: Stephen K. Christiansen
Represented By: Anthony W. Stirling
Represented By: Joshua Cutler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Corporation a New York corporation doing business as AT7T Mobile and Business Soltuions
Represented By: Jared D. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Corporation
Represented By: Jared D. Scott
Represented By: Jacob D Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Corporation a New York corporation doing business as AT&T Mobile and Business Soltuions
Represented By: Jared D. Scott
Represented By: Jacob D Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: AT&T Corporation
Represented By: Jared D. Scott
Represented By: Jacob D Barney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?