S. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al
Plaintiff: J. S. and A. S.
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance, United Behavioral Health, Maersk Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan and Maersk Inc Welfare Benefits Plan
Case Number: 2:2022cv00075
Filed: February 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jill N Parrish
Referring Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2022 Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, filed by Defendants Maersk Inc Welfare Benefits Plan, United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead. Attorney Bentley J. Tolk added to party Maersk Inc Welfare Benefits Plan(pty:dft), Attorney Bentley J. Tolk added to party United Behavioral Health(pty:dft), Attorney Bentley J. Tolk added to party United Healthcare Insurance(pty:dft)(Tolk, Bentley)
April 8, 2022 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by J. S., A. S. as to United Behavioral Health Waiver sent on 2/8/2022, answer due 4/11/2022. (King, Brian)
April 8, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by J. S., A. S. as to United Healthcare Insurance Waiver sent on 2/8/2022, answer due 4/11/2022. (King, Brian)
April 8, 2022 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by J. S., A. S. as to Maersk Inc Welfare Benefits Plan Waiver sent on 2/8/2022, answer due 4/11/2022. (King, Brian)
March 1, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #3 filed by Plaintiffs A. S., J. S. (King, Brian)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within twenty-one (21) days after any defendant has been served or any defendant has appeared, unless any party is appearing pro se. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/23/22. (alf)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 02/22/2022. (lwh)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 02/22/2022. (lwh)
February 8, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Maersk Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, United Behavioral Health, United Healthcare Insurance (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4243225) filed by J. S., A. S.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (King, Brian)
February 8, 2022 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Plaintiffs A. S., J. S. is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. S.
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A. S.
Represented By: Brian S. King
Represented By: Brent J. Newton
Represented By: Samuel Martin Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance
Represented By: Bentley J. Tolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Behavioral Health
Represented By: Bentley J. Tolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maersk Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maersk Inc Welfare Benefits Plan
Represented By: Bentley J. Tolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?