Flower Turbines, Inc. v. Universal Energy Inc. et al
| Flower Turbines, Inc. |
| Universal Energy Inc. and Ventana Tek, LLC |
| 2:2022cv00324 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Flower Turbines, Inc. filed by Ventana Tek, LLC, Universal Energy Inc..(Miller, Mark) |
Filing 27
ORDER granting #26 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael G. Gabriel for Flower Turbines, Inc..Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 6/7/22. (alf)
|
| Filing 26 Plaintiff's MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael G. Gabriel , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4355186,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Flower Turbines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order)(Edwards, Terrence) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #19 filed by Plaintiff Flower Turbines, Inc. (Edwards, Terrence) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett L. Foster on behalf of Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC (Foster, Brett) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order #19 filed by Defendants Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC (Miller, Mark) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/1/22. (alf)
|
| Filing 22 Mail Returned as Undeliverable - "Attempted - Not Known, Unable to Forward". Mail sent to Bruce R.M. Ewing: PHV requirements. (alf) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 05/31/2022. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 19
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 05/27/2022. (lwh)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Terrence J. Edwards on behalf of Flower Turbines, Inc. (Edwards, Terrence) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark A. Miller on behalf of Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC (Miller, Mark) |
| Filing 16 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint with Exhibit) (mh) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Bruce R.M. Ewing, for Defendants Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC. (mh) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Andrew Bochner, for Plaintiff Flower Turbines, Inc. (mh) |
| Filing 13 Case transferred in from USDC of New York Eastern; Case Number 2:22-cv-01230. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. USDC District of Utah case number 2:22-cv-00324 assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. |
|
Filing 12
ORDER re #11 Stipulation and Joint Request to Transfer Action to the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah - This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake City) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). SEE ATTACHED ORDER. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 5/12/2022. (Coleman, Laurie) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.]
|
| CASE TRANSFERRED to District of District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake City). Docket sheet sent electronically. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Coleman, Laurie) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION and joint request to transfer by Flower Turbines, Inc. (Bochner, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held on June 3, 2022, at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than May 27, 2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 4/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Ortiz, Grisel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/22/2022) (Ortiz, Grisel). [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.]
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to the Complaint by Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC (Ewing, Bruce) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Bruce R.M. Ewing on behalf of Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Ewing, Bruce) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Flower Turbines, Inc.. Ventana Tek, LLC served on 3/25/2022, answer due 4/15/2022. (Bochner, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Flower Turbines, Inc.. Universal Energy Inc. served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Bochner, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Jakubowski, Laura) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit) (Jakubowski, Laura) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/8/2022. (Davis, Kimberly) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Universal Energy Inc., Ventana Tek, LLC Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Flower Turbines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 AO120) (Bochner, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Eastern on 5/13/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
