Woods v. Colvin
Dalton Woods |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
2:2024cv00936 |
December 18, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
Jared C Bennett |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Berndt on behalf of Carolyn W. Colvin (Berndt, Amanda) |
Filing 4 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #1 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 2/18/2025. (kec) |
![]() |
Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. and Memorandum in Support Case file will be forwarded to a Magistrate Judge after intake review, filed by Plaintiff Dalton Woods. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin with In Forma Pauperis request filed by Dalton Woods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bolli-Jones, Natalie) |
Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett added. Case number will now read 2:24-cv-00936-JCB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.