Poe v. Peck
Nicholas Scott Poe |
L. Brad Peck |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
2:2025cv00090 |
February 7, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
David Barlow |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Nicholas Scott Poe (kpf) |
Filing 6 MOTION to lower the IFP fee filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Poe. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf) |
Filing 5 **SEALED DOCUMENT** FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Poe received from Correctional Institution. Initial Partial Filing Fee $ 7.00. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Statement, #2 FFF Initial Payment Statement)(kpf) |
![]() |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Poe. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Order)(kec) |
Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 2/7/2025) filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Scott Poe. (kec) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L. Brad Peck (Originally received by the court on 2/7/2025). (Fee Status: In Forma Pauperis) filed by Nicholas Scott Poe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge David Barlow (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.