Aguilar v. Birkholz
Edwin Aguilar |
FNU Birkholz and United States of America |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
2:2025cv00121 |
February 19, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
Clark Waddoups |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Edwin Aguilar. (jrj) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Central District of California via electronic and given the case number 2:25-cv-02240. (kec) |
Filing 4 Interdistrict Transfer to Central District of California. Record transferred to receiving court electronically. All future documents should be filed in Central District of California District Court. Case closed. (kpf) |
![]() |
Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 2/18/2025) filed by Petitioner Edwin Aguilar. (kec) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal, under 28 U.S.C. 2241 Fee Status: In Forma Pauperis. (Originally received on 2/18/2025) filed by Edwin Aguilar. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Assigned to Judge Clark Waddoups (kec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.