Markel American Insurance v. Antelope Point Holdings
Markel American Insurance |
Antelope Point Holdings doing business as Antelope Point Marina |
Zeus |
4:2022cv00053 |
August 10, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
Tena Campbell |
Paul Kohler |
David Nuffer |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zeus, Markel American Insurance as to Antelope Point Holdings served on 9/13/2022, answer due 10/4/2022. (Myers, Zachary) |
![]() |
Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Antelope Point Holdings. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks) |
Filing 8 Remark: The Magistrate Availability form has been received. The case shall remain with District Judge presider. (alf) |
Filing 7 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Plaintiff Markel American Insurance. (alf) |
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Tena Campbell as a result of Judge Nuffer's interim role as acting Chief Deputy Clerk. Judge David Nuffer no longer assigned to the case. Case number will now read 4:22cv00053 TC. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (alt) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah is available to conduct proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. The magistrate judge may preside over this case only after the relevant parties voluntarily sign and return the #Consent Form. To have a magistrate judge preside over this case, please complete and return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail to the address on the form. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case docket. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Antelope Point Holdings, Plaintiff Markel American Insurance. Form due by 9/6/2022. (alf) |
Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Antelope Point Holdings. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Markel American Insurance identifying Markel Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Myers, Zachary) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Antelope Point Holdings (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4414066) filed by Markel American Insurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Myers, Zachary) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiff Markel American Insurance is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.