Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor Company v. Kastner

Defendant: Sidney Kastner
Plaintiff: Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv00186
Filed: August 15, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Brattleboro Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: J. Garvan Murtha
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING denying 4 Dft's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and denying 7 Dft's Motion to Amend 4 . Dft shall file an answer to 1 Complaint by 4/18/2013. The parties shall consult and, within forty-five days after the answer is filed, jointly prepare and file a proposed discovery schedule. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 3/28/2013. (kak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor Company v. Kastner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sidney Kastner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor Company
Represented By: Andrew D. Manitsky, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.