Lawyer v. State of Vermont - Department of Public Safety et al
| Ryan Lawyer |
| State of Vermont - Department of Public Safety, Drew Cota, Ben Patnode and Derek Rolandini |
| 1:2016cv00062 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Brattleboro Office |
| Franklin |
| J. Garvan Murtha |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
RULING granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss. Count Two is dismissed in its entirety; Counts Four and Five and the state law IIED claim are dismissed as to Defendants Patnode and Rolandini; and the state law NIED claim is dismi ssed in its entirety. The remaining claims are for false arrest (Count One); malicious prosecution (Count Three); and abuse of process (Count Four), falsification of evidence, under the Fourth Amendment (Count V) and IIED under state law, against Defendant Cota. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 6/14/2017. (kak)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. All claims against the State of VT-Dept of Public Safety and dfts Cota, Patnode, and Rolandini in their official capacities are dismissed. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by 1/17/2017. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 12/27/2016. (kak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
